Field-portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer use in volcanogenic massive sulphide exploration with examples from the Touleary occurrence (MINFILE Occurrence 115O 176) in west-central Yukon
Field-portable x-ray fluorescence analysers (pXRF) are becoming a common tool in the savvy mineral explorer’s tool kit. Benefits include portability and ease of use, real-time acquisition of XRF data with minimal processing, immediate availability and analysis of data in the field, and a reasonably large number of elements that can be measured reliably. The findings indicate that data for 15 elements obtained with an Innov-X Omega pXRF analyser (2010 version) correlate well with lithogeochemical whole-rock analyses with R² values generally =0.7. The difference in elemental abundances between pXRF analyses of thin section off-cuts (a proxy for drill core) and pulps from the whole-rock analyses are generally ± 35%, indicating that no sample preparation is needed for the rock samples analysed in this study. The uncorrected pXRF values of some elements can be very similar to whole-rock analytical abundances; however, it is recommended that uncorrected pXRF data only be used semi-quantitatively, such as for downhole elemental plots in which relative patterns or trends are more informative than individual data points. For more sophisticated plots such as those combining elements into ratios to form alteration indices, corrected pXRF data should be used. The pXRF data are also adequate for construction of simple volcanic composition plots that can be used to aid in identification of protolith compositions of altered samples. The pXRF is well suited to volcanogenic massive sulphide exploration as the analytical data obtained from drill core (using thin section off-cuts as a proxy) are comparable to whole-rock analyses and the range of immobile and mobile, major and trace elements should be versatile enough for most exploration programs. However, pXRF shouldn’t be viewed as a replacement to traditional whole-rock geochemical methods.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:19 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:19 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
Field-portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer use in volcanogenic massive sulphide exploration with examples from the Touleary occurrence (MINFILE Occurrence 115O 176) in west-central Yukon |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
Field-portable x-ray fluorescence analysers (pXRF) are becoming a common tool in the savvy mineral explorer’s tool kit. Benefits include portability and ease of use, real-time acquisition of XRF data with minimal processing, immediate availability and analysis of data in the field, and a reasonably large number of elements that can be measured reliably. The findings indicate that data for 15 elements obtained with an Innov-X Omega pXRF analyser (2010 version) correlate well with lithogeochemical whole-rock analyses with R² values generally =0.7. The difference in elemental abundances between pXRF analyses of thin section off-cuts (a proxy for drill core) and pulps from the whole-rock analyses are generally ± 35%, indicating that no sample preparation is needed for the rock samples analysed in this study. The uncorrected pXRF values of some elements can be very similar to whole-rock analytical abundances; however, it is recommended that uncorrected pXRF data only be used semi-quantitatively, such as for downhole elemental plots in which relative patterns or trends are more informative than individual data points. For more sophisticated plots such as those combining elements into ratios to form alteration indices, corrected pXRF data should be used. The pXRF data are also adequate for construction of simple volcanic composition plots that can be used to aid in identification of protolith compositions of altered samples. The pXRF is well suited to volcanogenic massive sulphide exploration as the analytical data obtained from drill core (using thin section off-cuts as a proxy) are comparable to whole-rock analyses and the range of immobile and mobile, major and trace elements should be versatile enough for most exploration programs. However, pXRF shouldn’t be viewed as a replacement to traditional whole-rock geochemical methods. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2013-02-25 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/eb2bf45f-08a9-44a8-80df-7e9c947b683e |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments