Quaternary Geology and Till Geochemistry of the Anvil District (Parts of 105K/2, 3, 5, 6 and 7), central Yukon Territory
The integration of till geochemistry and glacial geology into Yukon mineral exploration has been largely underused. In the Anvil district, thick glacial deposits have consistently hampered exploration. From the time of the initial discovery made in Vangorda Creek, it took an additional 20 years before the Grum deposit was discovered only 2 km to the northwest. This work examines the utility of till geochemistry as a method to trace mineralized soil/till samples back to their source rocks in the Anvil district. The Anvil district was last glaciated during the McConnell glaciation, which had a significant impact on the local terrain. The relatively swift-flowing Cordilleran ice sheet deposited thick sequences of till in low-lying areas and eroded southeast-facing slopes and hill summits in the Swim basin and Vangorda plateau. This type of glacial history is conducive for till geochemical exploration. Evidence for a late glacial Cordilleran re-advance is discussed and has implications on prospecting in the district.
A 12-km2 till grid was sampled northwest of the Faro deposit to map the glacial dispersion of mineralized sediment. The till geochemistry on the -230 mesh fraction (silt and clay) indicated a broad dispersion plume for lead, zinc and copper extending more than 5 km west of the Faro Pb/Zn deposit. A section of the dispersion train may have a palimpsest origin. The soil geochemistry on the -80 mesh fraction, from 1964 data, indicated a much narrower dispersion plume extending directly from the Faro deposit. The geochemical changes at depth in the till stratigraphy were examined at the Vangorda mine. Results showed that anomalous lead concentrations, unlike zinc concentrations, were found throughout the 20-m till column. Regional till sampling was carried out in three areas peripheral to the known massive sulphide deposits. Results from these sampling programs highlighted anomalies in lead, zinc and copper. Overall, the application of till geochemistry proved to be successful in the Anvil district. Applying similar techniques to drift-covered terrain elsewhere in the northern Cordillera would be beneficial.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:20 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:20 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
Quaternary Geology and Till Geochemistry of the Anvil District (Parts of 105K/2, 3, 5, 6 and 7), central Yukon Territory |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
The integration of till geochemistry and glacial geology into Yukon mineral exploration has been largely underused. In the Anvil district, thick glacial deposits have consistently hampered exploration. From the time of the initial discovery made in Vangorda Creek, it took an additional 20 years before the Grum deposit was discovered only 2 km to the northwest. This work examines the utility of till geochemistry as a method to trace mineralized soil/till samples back to their source rocks in the Anvil district. The Anvil district was last glaciated during the McConnell glaciation, which had a significant impact on the local terrain. The relatively swift-flowing Cordilleran ice sheet deposited thick sequences of till in low-lying areas and eroded southeast-facing slopes and hill summits in the Swim basin and Vangorda plateau. This type of glacial history is conducive for till geochemical exploration. Evidence for a late glacial Cordilleran re-advance is discussed and has implications on prospecting in the district. A 12-km2 till grid was sampled northwest of the Faro deposit to map the glacial dispersion of mineralized sediment. The till geochemistry on the -230 mesh fraction (silt and clay) indicated a broad dispersion plume for lead, zinc and copper extending more than 5 km west of the Faro Pb/Zn deposit. A section of the dispersion train may have a palimpsest origin. The soil geochemistry on the -80 mesh fraction, from 1964 data, indicated a much narrower dispersion plume extending directly from the Faro deposit. The geochemical changes at depth in the till stratigraphy were examined at the Vangorda mine. Results showed that anomalous lead concentrations, unlike zinc concentrations, were found throughout the 20-m till column. Regional till sampling was carried out in three areas peripheral to the known massive sulphide deposits. Results from these sampling programs highlighted anomalies in lead, zinc and copper. Overall, the application of till geochemistry proved to be successful in the Anvil district. Applying similar techniques to drift-covered terrain elsewhere in the northern Cordillera would be beneficial. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2011-04-04 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/b355fa39-da95-430c-ae97-a72355bcf696 |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments