Analysis of geoscience data for geothermal exploration along the Tintina fault near Watson Lake, Yukon
In collaboration with the Yukon Geological Survey, Liard First Nation and other project partners, Innovate Geothermal Ltd. performed an analysis of geoscience data in southeastern Yukon as part of an effort to better understand the potential for geothermal energy resources that, if present, could be utilized to help reduce fossil fuel use in off-grid communities. The study area for this project is located near the Town of Watson Lake and straddles the crustal-scale Tintina fault zone. The main aim of this project is to analyze and interpret a variety of pre-existing and newly-acquired geological and geophysical datasets to evaluate whether geothermal reservoirs may be present within the study area. A secondary aim is to propose favourable drilling locations, if warranted, for exploratory wells to collect information on subsurface temperature and permeability. The geoscience work accomplished here includes both 2D map interpretation as well as construction of a 3D geologic model that was guided by geophysical inversion modelling of gravity, magnetic and magnetotelluric survey data. In the study area, the distribution of temperature in the subsurface remains a significant unknown; however, limited evidence suggests subsurface temperatures are modest. Regional-scale, Curie point depth estimates suggest an average geothermal gradient of only ~31°C/km. In contrast, two oil and gas exploration wells from the 1960s located 15–35 km outside the study area give a geothermal gradient range of ~38–50°C/km. Drilling is required to measure actual subsurface temperature gradients in the vicinity of Watson Lake. Evidence for substantial subsurface permeability is generally lacking in the study area. Analysis of the geoscience data did not reveal any specific locations along the Tintina fault that suggest a structural environment favourable for subsurface fracture permeability. Furthermore, the Tintina fault presents little evidence of active tectonism. Active tectonism helps maintain open fractures in the fault zone which could facilitate deep circulation of fluids to form a natural geothermal system. A lack of active tectonism could limit permeability in the fault zone. In addition, geophysical modelling suggests that large portions of the Watson Lake study area are likely underlain by shale-rich bedrock. This type of rock has very low permeability and is not favourable for maintaining open fractures. The only evidence for subsurface permeability found in this study is sand layers in the Cenozoic sedimentary rock of the Tintina trough. These sand layers could be permeable but are interbedded with low permeability layers such as silt and clay; the thickness and lateral extent of the sand layers is unknown. The 3D geologic model developed in this study suggests that the Cenozoic sedimentary rock of the Tintina trough is limited to less than ~1 km thick. This implies that fluids residing in sand layers in this rock unit would have a maximum temperature of between ~38 and 50°C. Geothermal fluids at these temperatures could potentially be utilized to help heat buildings in the community of Upper Liard. Many unknowns regarding the temperature and permeability of the subsurface still exist in the Watson Lake study area. The location of a 1 km deep scientific research well is proposed to help answer many of the remaining questions. However, considering the lack of evidence for bedrock permeability in the study area, other approaches to utilizing the Earth’s heat, such as Borehole Thermal Energy Storage (BTES) systems, could be considered to help the community of Watson Lake reduce dependence on fossil fuels for residential heating.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:20 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:20 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
Analysis of geoscience data for geothermal exploration along the Tintina fault near Watson Lake, Yukon |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
In collaboration with the Yukon Geological Survey, Liard First Nation and other project partners, Innovate Geothermal Ltd. performed an analysis of geoscience data in southeastern Yukon as part of an effort to better understand the potential for geothermal energy resources that, if present, could be utilized to help reduce fossil fuel use in off-grid communities. The study area for this project is located near the Town of Watson Lake and straddles the crustal-scale Tintina fault zone. The main aim of this project is to analyze and interpret a variety of pre-existing and newly-acquired geological and geophysical datasets to evaluate whether geothermal reservoirs may be present within the study area. A secondary aim is to propose favourable drilling locations, if warranted, for exploratory wells to collect information on subsurface temperature and permeability. The geoscience work accomplished here includes both 2D map interpretation as well as construction of a 3D geologic model that was guided by geophysical inversion modelling of gravity, magnetic and magnetotelluric survey data. In the study area, the distribution of temperature in the subsurface remains a significant unknown; however, limited evidence suggests subsurface temperatures are modest. Regional-scale, Curie point depth estimates suggest an average geothermal gradient of only ~31°C/km. In contrast, two oil and gas exploration wells from the 1960s located 15–35 km outside the study area give a geothermal gradient range of ~38–50°C/km. Drilling is required to measure actual subsurface temperature gradients in the vicinity of Watson Lake. Evidence for substantial subsurface permeability is generally lacking in the study area. Analysis of the geoscience data did not reveal any specific locations along the Tintina fault that suggest a structural environment favourable for subsurface fracture permeability. Furthermore, the Tintina fault presents little evidence of active tectonism. Active tectonism helps maintain open fractures in the fault zone which could facilitate deep circulation of fluids to form a natural geothermal system. A lack of active tectonism could limit permeability in the fault zone. In addition, geophysical modelling suggests that large portions of the Watson Lake study area are likely underlain by shale-rich bedrock. This type of rock has very low permeability and is not favourable for maintaining open fractures. The only evidence for subsurface permeability found in this study is sand layers in the Cenozoic sedimentary rock of the Tintina trough. These sand layers could be permeable but are interbedded with low permeability layers such as silt and clay; the thickness and lateral extent of the sand layers is unknown. The 3D geologic model developed in this study suggests that the Cenozoic sedimentary rock of the Tintina trough is limited to less than ~1 km thick. This implies that fluids residing in sand layers in this rock unit would have a maximum temperature of between ~38 and 50°C. Geothermal fluids at these temperatures could potentially be utilized to help heat buildings in the community of Upper Liard. Many unknowns regarding the temperature and permeability of the subsurface still exist in the Watson Lake study area. The location of a 1 km deep scientific research well is proposed to help answer many of the remaining questions. However, considering the lack of evidence for bedrock permeability in the study area, other approaches to utilizing the Earth’s heat, such as Borehole Thermal Energy Storage (BTES) systems, could be considered to help the community of Watson Lake reduce dependence on fossil fuels for residential heating. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2022-12-29 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/ad7aa9f2-0cff-4301-a4b7-c8a0cfa5e6ca |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments