Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide

This Revised User’s Guide (which we sometimes call the “RUG”) updates and replaces the two previous versions: the original User’s Guide released in July 2008 with the Final Version of the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG); and the New and Improved User’s Guide which we produced in March 2010. The previous versions of the User’s Guide have frequently been cited by the courts in their decisions, and by lawyers in their arguments about the Advisory Guidelines. This version provides us with an opportunity to update the past five years of SSAG case law, as well as to address some practical issues which have emerged since 2010.

The SSAG have now been in use for more than ten years, starting with the Draft Proposal in January 2005 and then the Final Version of 2008. Since the SSAGs are well-known and consistently used across the country, judges and lawyers are more often digging deeper into difficult and unexplored issues. Further, there is much more cross-fertilization amongst provinces and territories today than there was in the early days of the SSAG.

The Revised User’s Guide is not intended to provide a comprehensive survey of the case law. That would be impossible, since there are now over 230 appeal court decisions and over 2,900 trial decisions that cite the SSAG. We have focused on leading appellate and trial decisions in the Guide. We hope to provide a starting point for research, but the Guide is not a substitute for the more thorough research that needs to be done by lawyers and judges for individual cases.

Like the two previous versions, the Revised User’s Guide is intended to provide practical assistance in the application and use of the SSAG: flagging common errors, offering suggestions for more effective use, noting useful decisions and recent trends, and identifying emerging issues. More and more often, the issues raised by lawyers and judges involve the interaction between the SSAG and the broader principles of the law of spousal support. As we revised the User’s Guide, we found ourselves wrestling with some of the hardest questions in spousal support law. We hope this version of the User’s Guide will assist others to work through individual cases, whether typical or atypical.

Datasets available for download

Additional Info

Field Value
Last Updated October 22, 2024, 16:22 (UTC)
Created October 1, 2024, 07:55 (UTC)
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
Description
A description of the dataset.

This Revised User’s Guide (which we sometimes call the “RUG”) updates and replaces the two previous versions: the original User’s Guide released in July 2008 with the Final Version of the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG); and the New and Improved User’s Guide which we produced in March 2010. The previous versions of the User’s Guide have frequently been cited by the courts in their decisions, and by lawyers in their arguments about the Advisory Guidelines. This version provides us with an opportunity to update the past five years of SSAG case law, as well as to address some practical issues which have emerged since 2010.

The SSAG have now been in use for more than ten years, starting with the Draft Proposal in January 2005 and then the Final Version of 2008. Since the SSAGs are well-known and consistently used across the country, judges and lawyers are more often digging deeper into difficult and unexplored issues. Further, there is much more cross-fertilization amongst provinces and territories today than there was in the early days of the SSAG.

The Revised User’s Guide is not intended to provide a comprehensive survey of the case law. That would be impossible, since there are now over 230 appeal court decisions and over 2,900 trial decisions that cite the SSAG. We have focused on leading appellate and trial decisions in the Guide. We hope to provide a starting point for research, but the Guide is not a substitute for the more thorough research that needs to be done by lawyers and judges for individual cases.

Like the two previous versions, the Revised User’s Guide is intended to provide practical assistance in the application and use of the SSAG: flagging common errors, offering suggestions for more effective use, noting useful decisions and recent trends, and identifying emerging issues. More and more often, the issues raised by lawyers and judges involve the interaction between the SSAG and the broader principles of the law of spousal support. As we revised the User’s Guide, we found ourselves wrestling with some of the hardest questions in spousal support law. We hope this version of the User’s Guide will assist others to work through individual cases, whether typical or atypical.

Tags
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
2016-09-06
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
Field Value
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
License
License used to access the dataset.
Open Government Licence - Canada
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
Location
Location of the dataset.
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
OG-GO@justice.gc.ca
Author
Author of the dataset.
Author Email
Email of the author.
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
Field Value
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
Field Value
Source
Source of the dataset.
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/59db494e-36f0-4fa4-9842-41998a5443b5
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
Field Value
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
Field Value
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.

0 Comments

Please login or register to comment.