Panel Discussion Report: Indigenous and Restorative Justice Approaches

The virtual panel explored how Indigenous justice, RJ or customary law approaches are used in two First Nations and one Inuit context. The panel helped to highlight that while RJ principles may have strong parallels to Indigenous legal principles and traditions, they are not the same thing. Several panellists highlighted the fundamental importance of community relationships in Indigenous justice approaches and the goal of meeting the needs of the collective rather than focusing primarily on the reparation of harm for an individual.

Canada’s adoption of the UN Declaration and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission report provide support to Indigenous nations and groups that are asserting their rights to maintain and reclaim their own justice systems and legal traditions as an expression of the larger right of self-determination.

The revitalization of Indigenous legal traditions creates opportunities to expand the use of Indigenous, RJ or customary law approaches within the existing Canadian legal system. However, it is also important to be aware that RJ processes that address criminal offending in Canada exist within the Canadian CJS, an adversarial punitive system that has been used to control Indigenous peoples for centuries.

There is an urgent need to restore harmony back to individuals and communities using culturally specific, community-driven initiatives and programs, and customary law approaches. Indigenous justice principles exist to restore peace and equilibrium within a community, with the goal of community harmony and good order. The collective culture of Indigenous peoples and the use of consensus-based approaches when addressing harm are fundamental to Indigenous justice.

The development of Indigenous justice systems and legal traditions goes beyond the expansion of the use of Indigenous RJ principles and programs within the Canadian CJS. It is essential that RJ approaches be implemented with an understanding of underlying social issues, the impact of trauma, colonization, and systemic racism. They need to be flexible in order to adapt to specific cultural and community-based processes.

It is incumbent on legal professionals working in Canada’s criminal justice system, to better understand Indigenous perspectives, Canada’s colonial history, Indigenous ways of being, and the racism and discrimination embedded in Canada’s laws and systems, in order to move forward together.

Datasets available for download

Additional Info

Field Value
Last Updated October 22, 2024, 16:22 (UTC)
Created October 1, 2024, 06:52 (UTC)
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
Description
A description of the dataset.

The virtual panel explored how Indigenous justice, RJ or customary law approaches are used in two First Nations and one Inuit context. The panel helped to highlight that while RJ principles may have strong parallels to Indigenous legal principles and traditions, they are not the same thing. Several panellists highlighted the fundamental importance of community relationships in Indigenous justice approaches and the goal of meeting the needs of the collective rather than focusing primarily on the reparation of harm for an individual.

Canada’s adoption of the UN Declaration and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission report provide support to Indigenous nations and groups that are asserting their rights to maintain and reclaim their own justice systems and legal traditions as an expression of the larger right of self-determination.

The revitalization of Indigenous legal traditions creates opportunities to expand the use of Indigenous, RJ or customary law approaches within the existing Canadian legal system. However, it is also important to be aware that RJ processes that address criminal offending in Canada exist within the Canadian CJS, an adversarial punitive system that has been used to control Indigenous peoples for centuries.

There is an urgent need to restore harmony back to individuals and communities using culturally specific, community-driven initiatives and programs, and customary law approaches. Indigenous justice principles exist to restore peace and equilibrium within a community, with the goal of community harmony and good order. The collective culture of Indigenous peoples and the use of consensus-based approaches when addressing harm are fundamental to Indigenous justice.

The development of Indigenous justice systems and legal traditions goes beyond the expansion of the use of Indigenous RJ principles and programs within the Canadian CJS. It is essential that RJ approaches be implemented with an understanding of underlying social issues, the impact of trauma, colonization, and systemic racism. They need to be flexible in order to adapt to specific cultural and community-based processes.

It is incumbent on legal professionals working in Canada’s criminal justice system, to better understand Indigenous perspectives, Canada’s colonial history, Indigenous ways of being, and the racism and discrimination embedded in Canada’s laws and systems, in order to move forward together.

Tags
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
2022-07-01
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
Field Value
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
License
License used to access the dataset.
Open Government Licence - Canada
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
Location
Location of the dataset.
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
OG-GO@justice.gc.ca
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
Field Value
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
Field Value
Source
Source of the dataset.
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/269ba92d-63dd-4994-a808-fa3d1c60713b
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
Field Value
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
Field Value
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.

0 Comments

Please login or register to comment.