New Brunswick Gulf of St. Lawrence Eelgrass Classification

Eelgrass (Zostera marina) is important to waterfowl such as Atlantic Brant (Branta bernicla hrota), Canada Goose (Branta canadensis), American Black Duck (Anas rubripes), Common Goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) and Barrow's Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica). In New Brunswick eelgrass can be found along the Gulf of St. Lawrence, in protected harbours. Within this dataset are the results of eelgrass land-cover classifications using either satellite or aerial photography for seven harbours: Bouctouche (46 30’N, 64 39’W); Miscou (47.90 N, -64.55 W); Neguac (47.25 N, -65.03 W); Richibucto (46.70 N, -64.80 W); Saint-Simon (47.77 N, -64.76 W); Tracadie (47.55 N, -64.88 W); and Cocagne (46.370 N, -64.600 W). Information on each dataset is provided:

  1. Bouctouche

This dataset contains results from an eelgrass classification for Bouctouche Bay, New Brunswick. True colour aerial photography at 57 centimetre resolution was collected on September 2, 2009 by Nortek Resources of Thorburn, Nova Scotia (http://www.nortekresources.com/). Image classification was conducted using eCognition Developer v. 8 Software, which first segments the image into spectrally similar units, which were then classified manually. Additionally, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Gulf Region, Moncton, NB) conducted a visual field survey in the same field season at 688 sites. Two-thirds of these sites were used to assist in image classification, while the remainder were used to assess accuracy. Three classes were identified:

i. Good Quality Eelgrass: relatively dense, clean, green blades with minimal epiphytes or algal growth.

ii. Medium Quality Eelgrass: predominately green blades that may have some epiphyte or algal growth. These stands can be less or equally dense as Good Quality Eelgrass, but the best grasses are certainly not as abundant.

iii. Eelgrass Absent/Poor Quality: eelgrass is absent, or if it is present it is typically covered with epiphytes or other algae or dying or dead.

Eelgrass was classified correctly 83.7% of the time in a fuzzy accuracy assessment technique, whereby those classes that were ‘off’ by one class, e.g. Good Quality eelgrass classed as Medium Quality, were given half credit towards the overall accuracy. Of 187 sites that were within the classification area, 131 were correct, 51 were "one-off", and 5 were incorrect [(131 + (51/2))/ 187 = 0.837].

  1. Miscou

True colour aerial photography at 57 centimetre resolution was collected on August 20th and 24th, 2009 by Nortek Resources of Thorburn, Nova Scotia (http://www.nortekresources.com/). Image classification was conducted using eCognition Developer v. 8 Software, which first segments the image into spectrally similar units, which were then classified manually. Additionally, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Gulf Region, Moncton, NB) conducted a visual field survey in the same field season at 103 sites. From these sites 70% were used to assist in image classification, while the remainder were used to assess accuracy. Three classes were identified:

i. Good Quality Eelgrass: relatively dense, clean, green blades with minimal epiphytes or algal growth.

ii. Medium Quality Eelgrass: predominately green blades that may have some epiphyte or algal growth. These stands can be less or equally dense as Good Quality Eelgrass, but the best grasses are certainly not as abundant.

iii. Eelgrass Absent/Poor Quality: eelgrass is absent, or if it is present it is typically covered with epiphytes or other algae or dying or dead.

Eelgrass was classified correctly 96.7% of the time (30/31 = 0.967).

  1. Neguac

This dataset contains results from an eelgrass classification for Neguac Bay, New Brunswick. True colour aerial photography at 57 centimetre resolution was collected on September 2, 2009 by Nortek Resources of Thorburn, Nova Scotia (http://www.nortekresources.com/). Image classification was conducted using eCognition Developer v. 8 Software, which first segments the image into spectrally similar units, which were then classified manually. Additionally, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Gulf Region, Moncton, NB) conducted a visual field survey in the same field season at 126 sites. Two-thirds of these sites were used to assist in image classification, while the remainder were used to assess accuracy. Three classes were identified:

i. Good Quality Eelgrass: relatively dense, clean, green blades with minimal epiphytes or algal growth.

ii. Medium Quality Eelgrass: predominately green blades that may have some epiphyte or algal growth. These stands can be less or equally dense as Good Quality Eelgrass, but the best grasses are certainly not as abundant.

iii. Eelgrass Absent/Poor Quality: eelgrass is absent, or if it is present it is typically covered with epiphytes or other algae or dying or dead.

Eelgrass was classified correctly 81% of the time in a fuzzy accuracy assessment technique, whereby those classes that were ‘off’ by one class, e.g. Good Quality eelgrass classed as Medium Quality, were given half credit towards the overall accuracy. Of 39 sites that were within the classification area, 27 were correct, 9 were "one-off", and 3 were incorrect [(27 + (9/2))/ 39 = 0.81].

  1. Richibucto

Eelgrass classification in Richibucto Harbour, New Brunswick. Derived from a Quickbird satellite image collected on August 28, 2007 at as close to low-tide as possible. Quickbird's ground resolution is 2.4 m. Classification was objected-oriented using Definiens software. Accuracy was 81.5%. Data used for accuracy and training was collected along transects using a differential GPS positioned towfish holding sidescan sonar, and a video camera that was later transcribed as XY points to describe eel-grass presence.

  1. Saint-Simon

An eelgrass distribution map was classified from remotely sensed imagery in Shippagan Harbour, New Brunswick. Derived from a Quickbird satellite image collected on July 27, 2007 at as close to low-tide as possible. Classification was objected-oriented using Definiens software. Data used for accuracy and training was collected along transects using a differential GPS positioned towfish holding sidescan sonar, and a video camera that was later transcribed as XY points to describe eel-grass presence.

  1. Tracadie

This dataset contains results from an eelgrass classification for Tracadie Bay, New Brunswick. True colour aerial photography at 57 centimetre resolution was collected on September 2, 2009 by Nortek Resources of Thorburn, Nova Scotia (http://www.nortekresources.com/). Image classification was conducted using eCognition Developer v. 8 Software, which first segments the image into spectrally similar units, which were then classified manually. Additionally, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Gulf Region, Moncton, NB) conducted a visual field survey in the same field season at 101 sites. Approximately two-thirds of these sites were used to assist in image classification, while the remainder was used to assess accuracy. Three classes were identified:

i. Good Quality Eelgrass: relatively dense, clean, green blades with minimal epiphytes or algal growth.

ii. Medium Quality Eelgrass: predominately green blades that may have some epiphyte or algal growth. These stands can be less or equally dense as Good Quality Eelgrass, but the best grasses are certainly not as abundant.

iii. Eelgrass Absent/Poor Quality: eelgrass is absent, or if it is present it is typically covered with epiphytes or other algae or dying or dead.

Eelgrass was classified correctly 79.3% of the time in a fuzzy accuracy assessment technique, whereby those classes that were ‘off’ by one class, e.g. Good Quality eelgrass classed as Medium Quality, were given half credit towards the overall accuracy. Of 29 sites that were within the classification area, 18 were correct, 10 were "one-off", and 1 was incorrect [(18 + (10/2))/ 29 = 0.793].

  1. Cocagne

Visible orthorectified aerial photography was used to classify polygons containing eelgrass in Cocagne Harbour. Field data for image training and validation were collected along transects in summer 2008 using a dGPS positioned towfish holding sidescan sonar and a video camera that was later transcribed as XY geographic points to describe eelgrass presence and a qualitative description of density. The area was flown for photography on September 24, 2008. eCognition Developer 8 software was used to segment the imagery, essentially polygons. Polygons were then classified manually for the presence of eelgrass. Using field data revealed eelgrass presence to be mapped correctly 87.2% of the time.

Jeux de données disponibles au téléchargement

Informations supplémentaires

Champ Valeur
Dernière mise à jour octobre 20, 2025, 02:53 (TU)
Créé octobre 20, 2025, 02:53 (TU)
Domaine / Sujet
Domaine ou sujet du jeu de données catalogué.
Biota
Titre
Titre du jeu de données.
New Brunswick Gulf of St. Lawrence Eelgrass Classification
Description
Une description du jeu de données.

Eelgrass (Zostera marina) is important to waterfowl such as Atlantic Brant (Branta bernicla hrota), Canada Goose (Branta canadensis), American Black Duck (Anas rubripes), Common Goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) and Barrow's Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica). In New Brunswick eelgrass can be found along the Gulf of St. Lawrence, in protected harbours. Within this dataset are the results of eelgrass land-cover classifications using either satellite or aerial photography for seven harbours: Bouctouche (46 30’N, 64 39’W); Miscou (47.90 N, -64.55 W); Neguac (47.25 N, -65.03 W); Richibucto (46.70 N, -64.80 W); Saint-Simon (47.77 N, -64.76 W); Tracadie (47.55 N, -64.88 W); and Cocagne (46.370 N, -64.600 W). Information on each dataset is provided:

  1. Bouctouche

This dataset contains results from an eelgrass classification for Bouctouche Bay, New Brunswick. True colour aerial photography at 57 centimetre resolution was collected on September 2, 2009 by Nortek Resources of Thorburn, Nova Scotia (http://www.nortekresources.com/). Image classification was conducted using eCognition Developer v. 8 Software, which first segments the image into spectrally similar units, which were then classified manually. Additionally, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Gulf Region, Moncton, NB) conducted a visual field survey in the same field season at 688 sites. Two-thirds of these sites were used to assist in image classification, while the remainder were used to assess accuracy. Three classes were identified:

i. Good Quality Eelgrass: relatively dense, clean, green blades with minimal epiphytes or algal growth.

ii. Medium Quality Eelgrass: predominately green blades that may have some epiphyte or algal growth. These stands can be less or equally dense as Good Quality Eelgrass, but the best grasses are certainly not as abundant.

iii. Eelgrass Absent/Poor Quality: eelgrass is absent, or if it is present it is typically covered with epiphytes or other algae or dying or dead.

Eelgrass was classified correctly 83.7% of the time in a fuzzy accuracy assessment technique, whereby those classes that were ‘off’ by one class, e.g. Good Quality eelgrass classed as Medium Quality, were given half credit towards the overall accuracy. Of 187 sites that were within the classification area, 131 were correct, 51 were "one-off", and 5 were incorrect [(131 + (51/2))/ 187 = 0.837].

  1. Miscou

True colour aerial photography at 57 centimetre resolution was collected on August 20th and 24th, 2009 by Nortek Resources of Thorburn, Nova Scotia (http://www.nortekresources.com/). Image classification was conducted using eCognition Developer v. 8 Software, which first segments the image into spectrally similar units, which were then classified manually. Additionally, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Gulf Region, Moncton, NB) conducted a visual field survey in the same field season at 103 sites. From these sites 70% were used to assist in image classification, while the remainder were used to assess accuracy. Three classes were identified:

i. Good Quality Eelgrass: relatively dense, clean, green blades with minimal epiphytes or algal growth.

ii. Medium Quality Eelgrass: predominately green blades that may have some epiphyte or algal growth. These stands can be less or equally dense as Good Quality Eelgrass, but the best grasses are certainly not as abundant.

iii. Eelgrass Absent/Poor Quality: eelgrass is absent, or if it is present it is typically covered with epiphytes or other algae or dying or dead.

Eelgrass was classified correctly 96.7% of the time (30/31 = 0.967).

  1. Neguac

This dataset contains results from an eelgrass classification for Neguac Bay, New Brunswick. True colour aerial photography at 57 centimetre resolution was collected on September 2, 2009 by Nortek Resources of Thorburn, Nova Scotia (http://www.nortekresources.com/). Image classification was conducted using eCognition Developer v. 8 Software, which first segments the image into spectrally similar units, which were then classified manually. Additionally, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Gulf Region, Moncton, NB) conducted a visual field survey in the same field season at 126 sites. Two-thirds of these sites were used to assist in image classification, while the remainder were used to assess accuracy. Three classes were identified:

i. Good Quality Eelgrass: relatively dense, clean, green blades with minimal epiphytes or algal growth.

ii. Medium Quality Eelgrass: predominately green blades that may have some epiphyte or algal growth. These stands can be less or equally dense as Good Quality Eelgrass, but the best grasses are certainly not as abundant.

iii. Eelgrass Absent/Poor Quality: eelgrass is absent, or if it is present it is typically covered with epiphytes or other algae or dying or dead.

Eelgrass was classified correctly 81% of the time in a fuzzy accuracy assessment technique, whereby those classes that were ‘off’ by one class, e.g. Good Quality eelgrass classed as Medium Quality, were given half credit towards the overall accuracy. Of 39 sites that were within the classification area, 27 were correct, 9 were "one-off", and 3 were incorrect [(27 + (9/2))/ 39 = 0.81].

  1. Richibucto

Eelgrass classification in Richibucto Harbour, New Brunswick. Derived from a Quickbird satellite image collected on August 28, 2007 at as close to low-tide as possible. Quickbird's ground resolution is 2.4 m. Classification was objected-oriented using Definiens software. Accuracy was 81.5%. Data used for accuracy and training was collected along transects using a differential GPS positioned towfish holding sidescan sonar, and a video camera that was later transcribed as XY points to describe eel-grass presence.

  1. Saint-Simon

An eelgrass distribution map was classified from remotely sensed imagery in Shippagan Harbour, New Brunswick. Derived from a Quickbird satellite image collected on July 27, 2007 at as close to low-tide as possible. Classification was objected-oriented using Definiens software. Data used for accuracy and training was collected along transects using a differential GPS positioned towfish holding sidescan sonar, and a video camera that was later transcribed as XY points to describe eel-grass presence.

  1. Tracadie

This dataset contains results from an eelgrass classification for Tracadie Bay, New Brunswick. True colour aerial photography at 57 centimetre resolution was collected on September 2, 2009 by Nortek Resources of Thorburn, Nova Scotia (http://www.nortekresources.com/). Image classification was conducted using eCognition Developer v. 8 Software, which first segments the image into spectrally similar units, which were then classified manually. Additionally, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Gulf Region, Moncton, NB) conducted a visual field survey in the same field season at 101 sites. Approximately two-thirds of these sites were used to assist in image classification, while the remainder was used to assess accuracy. Three classes were identified:

i. Good Quality Eelgrass: relatively dense, clean, green blades with minimal epiphytes or algal growth.

ii. Medium Quality Eelgrass: predominately green blades that may have some epiphyte or algal growth. These stands can be less or equally dense as Good Quality Eelgrass, but the best grasses are certainly not as abundant.

iii. Eelgrass Absent/Poor Quality: eelgrass is absent, or if it is present it is typically covered with epiphytes or other algae or dying or dead.

Eelgrass was classified correctly 79.3% of the time in a fuzzy accuracy assessment technique, whereby those classes that were ‘off’ by one class, e.g. Good Quality eelgrass classed as Medium Quality, were given half credit towards the overall accuracy. Of 29 sites that were within the classification area, 18 were correct, 10 were "one-off", and 1 was incorrect [(18 + (10/2))/ 29 = 0.793].

  1. Cocagne

Visible orthorectified aerial photography was used to classify polygons containing eelgrass in Cocagne Harbour. Field data for image training and validation were collected along transects in summer 2008 using a dGPS positioned towfish holding sidescan sonar and a video camera that was later transcribed as XY geographic points to describe eelgrass presence and a qualitative description of density. The area was flown for photography on September 24, 2008. eCognition Developer 8 software was used to segment the imagery, essentially polygons. Polygons were then classified manually for the presence of eelgrass. Using field data revealed eelgrass presence to be mapped correctly 87.2% of the time.
Étiquettes / Mots-clés
Mots-clés/étiquettes catégorisant le jeu de données.
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc.)
Format de fichier du jeu de données.
Taille du jeu de données
Taille du jeu de données en mégaoctets.
Identifiant des métadonnées
Identifiant des métadonnées — peut être utilisé comme identifiant unique pour l’entrée du catalogue.
Date de publication
Date de publication du jeu de données.
2016-03-09
Période temporelle des données (date de début)
Date de début des données dans le jeu de données.
Période temporelle des données (date de fin)
Date de fin des données temporelles du jeu de données.
Zone géospatiale couverte
Région spatiale ou lieu nommé couvert par le jeu de données.
Champ Valeur
Catégorie d’accès
Type d’accès accordé pour le jeu de données (ouvert, restreint, service, etc.).
Licence
Licence utilisée pour accéder au jeu de données.
Open Government Licence - Canada
Restrictions d’utilisation
Restrictions d’utilisation des données.
Emplacement
Emplacement du jeu de données.
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/b4a6954f-d247-4bf5-81c0-717333c3a4a7
Service de données
Service de données pour accéder à un jeu de données.
Propriétaire
Propriétaire du jeu de données.
Environment and Climate Change Canada | Environnement et Changement climatique Canada
Point de contact
Qui contacter concernant l’accès ?
Government of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Canadian Wildlife Service, 1-800-668-6767, [email protected]
Courriel du point de contact
Courriel à utiliser pour l’accès ?
Éditeur
Éditeur du jeu de données.
Courriel de l’éditeur
Adresse courriel de l’éditeur.
[email protected]
Auteur
Auteur du jeu de données.
Courriel de l'auteur
Adresse courriel de l’auteur.
Date d’accès
Date à laquelle les données et métadonnées ont été consultées.
Champ Valeur
Identifiant
Identifiant unique du jeu de données.
Langue
Langue(s) du jeu de données
Lien vers la description du jeu de données
Une URL vers un document externe décrivant le jeu de données.
Identifiant persistant
Les données sont identifiées par un identifiant persistant.
Identifiant globalement unique
Les données sont identifiées par un identifiant persistant et globalement unique.
Contient des données sur des individus
Le jeu de données contient-il des données sur des individus ?
Contient des données identifiables sur des individus
Le jeu de données contient-il des données identifiables sur des individus ?
Contient des données autochtones
Le jeu de données contient-il des données sur des communautés autochtones ?
Type de portail
Type de plateforme du portail source.
Champ Valeur
Version
Version du jeu de données
None
Source
Source du jeu de données.
None
Notes de version
Notes de version à propos du jeu de données.
Est une version d’un autre jeu de données
Lien vers le jeu de données dont celui-ci est une version.
Autres versions
Lien vers les jeux de données qui en sont des versions.
Texte de provenance
Texte de provenance des données.
URL de provenance
URL de provenance des données.
Résolution temporelle
Décrit la granularité des données temporelles dans le jeu de données.
Résolution géospatiale en mètres
Décrit la granularité (en mètres) des données géospatiales dans le jeu de données.
Résolution géospatiale (par régions)
Décrit la granularité (par régions) des données géospatiales dans le jeu de données.
Champ Valeur
Permission de la communauté autochtone
Qui détient la permission de la communauté autochtone. Qui contacter pour l’accès à un jeu de données concernant des communautés autochtones.
Permission communautaire
Permission communautaire (qui a accordé la permission).
Les communautés autochtones concernées par le jeu de données
Communautés autochtones dont sont issues les données.
Champ Valeur
Nombre de lignes de données
Pour un jeu de données tabulaire, nombre total de lignes.
Nombre de colonnes de données
Pour un jeu de données tabulaire, nombre total de colonnes uniques.
Nombre de cellules de données
Pour un jeu de données tabulaire, nombre total de cellules contenant des données.
Nombre de relations de données
Pour un jeu de données RDF, nombre total de triplets.
Nombre d’entités
Pour un jeu de données RDF, nombre total d’entités.
Nombre de propriétés de données
Pour un jeu de données RDF, nombre total de propriétés uniques utilisées par les triplets.
Qualité des données
Décrit la qualité des données du jeu de données.
Métrique de qualité des données
Une métrique utilisée pour mesurer la qualité des données, telle que les valeurs manquantes ou les formats invalides.

0 Commentaires

Please login or register to comment.