RAP Aesthetics Observations
RAP Aesthetics Observations In order to assess the Degradation of Aesthetics BUI for the Toronto and Region AOC, an assessment protocol was developed that utilized existing monitoring programs and local expertise within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). The objective of the aesthetics monitoring program was to identify substances that produce persistent objectionable or unnatural debris, turbidity, colour, or odour in local watersheds or along the waterfront, and to compare aesthetics within the AOC to regional conditions.
The protocol’s sampling and analytical methodologies for assessing the Degradation of Aesthetics BUI were adapted from similar work conducted by Heidtka and Tauriainen (1996) in the Rouge River AOC in Detroit, Michigan. The results of a pilot study led by TRCA during 2001 and 2002 (TRCA, 2003), which had community volunteers assess aesthetic conditions of watersheds, were used to further inform the development of a standardized sampling protocol and training for TRCA field crews. Detailed methodology can be found in Method to Assess Beneficial Use Impairment (BUI) Degradation of Aesthetics (Toronto) (Mutton, 2012; Appendix A).
Study Area
Samples (i.e., observations) were collected from nine watersheds within TRCA’s jurisdiction, as well as from Frenchman’s Bay and the Lake Ontario waterfront at Toronto. The area was divided into the “RAP area” and “Non-RAP area” to allow a comparison of conditions within the AOC, to regional conditions. The RAP area includes the six watersheds from Etobicoke Creek in the west to the Rouge River in the east – and corresponding 42 km of waterfront – along the western portion of the jurisdiction, while the Non-RAP area includes the watersheds and waterfront to the east of the Rouge River.
Sample Collection
The aesthetics monitoring program was implemented during 2012, 2013, and 2015 as part of TRCA’s ongoing waterfront and watershed monitoring activities. Aesthetics observations were recorded each time a site was visited by field crews. Observations were made during daylight hours and not during heavy rain. In 2012 and 2015 both stream and waterfront sites were sampled; However during 2013 only stream sites were sampled.
Datasets available for download
-
RAPSamplesFull_SpatialJoinFeature Layer
Layer 0 via ArcGIS REST API
-
RAPSamplesFull_SpatialJoin (Explore)HTML
Explore RAPSamplesFull_SpatialJoin on ArcGIS Hub
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | May 19, 2026, 16:31 (UTC) |
| Created | May 19, 2026, 16:31 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
RAP Aesthetics Observations |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
RAP Aesthetics Observations In order to assess the Degradation of Aesthetics BUI for the Toronto and Region AOC, an assessment protocol was developed that utilized existing monitoring programs and local expertise within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). The objective of the aesthetics monitoring program was to identify substances that produce persistent objectionable or unnatural debris, turbidity, colour, or odour in local watersheds or along the waterfront, and to compare aesthetics within the AOC to regional conditions. The protocol’s sampling and analytical methodologies for assessing the Degradation of Aesthetics BUI were adapted from similar work conducted by Heidtka and Tauriainen (1996) in the Rouge River AOC in Detroit, Michigan. The results of a pilot study led by TRCA during 2001 and 2002 (TRCA, 2003), which had community volunteers assess aesthetic conditions of watersheds, were used to further inform the development of a standardized sampling protocol and training for TRCA field crews. Detailed methodology can be found in Method to Assess Beneficial Use Impairment (BUI) Degradation of Aesthetics (Toronto) (Mutton, 2012; Appendix A). Study Area Samples (i.e., observations) were collected from nine watersheds within TRCA’s jurisdiction, as well as from Frenchman’s Bay and the Lake Ontario waterfront at Toronto. The area was divided into the “RAP area” and “Non-RAP area” to allow a comparison of conditions within the AOC, to regional conditions. The RAP area includes the six watersheds from Etobicoke Creek in the west to the Rouge River in the east – and corresponding 42 km of waterfront – along the western portion of the jurisdiction, while the Non-RAP area includes the watersheds and waterfront to the east of the Rouge River. Sample Collection The aesthetics monitoring program was implemented during 2012, 2013, and 2015 as part of TRCA’s ongoing waterfront and watershed monitoring activities. Aesthetics observations were recorded each time a site was visited by field crews. Observations were made during daylight hours and not during heavy rain. In 2012 and 2015 both stream and waterfront sites were sampled; However during 2013 only stream sites were sampled.
|
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
1368.0 |
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2020-08-10 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
public |
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Open Data Licence v1.0 - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://trca-camaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/camaps::rap-aesthetics-observations |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
trca_d.macleod |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Conservation Ontario |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
[email protected] |
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
Conservation Ontario |
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
|
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
trca_d.macleod |
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
2023-04-28 |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
83a34f166d8a4c9c921978d4a01ade51 |
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
English |
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
https://trca-camaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/camaps::rap-aesthetics-observations |
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
Conservation Ontario |
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
2103 |
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
24 |
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
50472 |
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments