HRWP Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas
Polygon file displaying significant groundwater recharge areas (SGRA) across the Toronto Region Source Protection Area (TRSPA) in the CTC Region.
The SGRA layer was developed to satisfy requirements of the Source Protection Plan for the Credit Valley, Toronto and Region and Central Lake Ontario region (CTC-SPC 2015) under the Clean Water Act (2006). Groundwater recharge occurs when rain/snow seeps down into an aquifer and generally this is associated with particular soil types (e.g., loose sand/gravel). SGRAs are delineated using a water budget modelling process, where the high potential recharge areas are delineated by the method outlined in full in CTC-SPC (2015). Details of the methodology used to develop this layer can be found in CTC-SPC (2015).
SGRAs have permeable soils such as sand or gravel that allow the water to soak easily into the ground. Under the Clean Water Act, 2006, a recharge area is considered significant when it helps maintain the water level in an aquifer that supplies drinking water (including private wells), and has higher than average recharge across the Source Protection Area. SGRAs are provided with vulnerable scores at the 2, 4 and 6 level. (Areas with a score of 2 are least vulnerable to contamination and areas with a score of 6 are most vulnerable).
This file was updated in 2018 and was approved as part of CTC's first Sec34 amendment in 2019. Within the Humber River Watershed: Polygon file displaying significant groundwater recharge areas (SGRAs) across the Toronto Region Source Protection Area (TRSPA) in the CTC Region.
The SGRA layer was developed to satisfy requirements of the Source Protection Plan for the Credit Valley, Toronto and Region and Central Lake Ontario region (CTC-SPC 2015) under the Clean Water Act (2006). Groundwater recharge occurs when rain/snow seeps down into an aquifer and generally this is associated with particular soil types (e.g., loose sand/gravel). SGRAs are delineated using a water budget modelling process, where the high potential recharge areas are delineated by the method outlined in full in CTC-SPC (2015). Details of the methodology used to develop this layer can be found in CTC-SPC (2015).
SGRAs have permeable soils such as sand or gravel that allow the water to soak easily into the ground. Under the Clean Water Act, 2006, a recharge area is considered significant when it helps maintain the water level in an aquifer that supplies drinking water (including private wells), and has higher than average recharge across the Source Protection Area. SGRA are provided with vulnerable scores at the 2, 4 and 6 level. (Areas with a score of 2 are least vulnerable to contamination and areas with a score of 6 are most vulnerable).
This file was updated in 2018 and was approved as part of CTC's first Sec34 amendment in 2019.
Datasets available for download
-
a24e9315Feature Layer
Layer 0 via ArcGIS REST API
-
a24e9315 (Explore)HTML
Explore a24e9315 on ArcGIS Hub
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | May 19, 2026, 16:31 (UTC) |
| Created | May 19, 2026, 16:31 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
HRWP Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
Polygon file displaying significant groundwater recharge areas (SGRA) across the Toronto Region Source Protection Area (TRSPA) in the CTC Region. The SGRA layer was developed to satisfy requirements of the Source Protection Plan for the Credit Valley, Toronto and Region and Central Lake Ontario region (CTC-SPC 2015) under the Clean Water Act (2006). Groundwater recharge occurs when rain/snow seeps down into an aquifer and generally this is associated with particular soil types (e.g., loose sand/gravel). SGRAs are delineated using a water budget modelling process, where the high potential recharge areas are delineated by the method outlined in full in CTC-SPC (2015). Details of the methodology used to develop this layer can be found in CTC-SPC (2015). SGRAs have permeable soils such as sand or gravel that allow the water to soak easily into the ground. Under the Clean Water Act, 2006, a recharge area is considered significant when it helps maintain the water level in an aquifer that supplies drinking water (including private wells), and has higher than average recharge across the Source Protection Area. SGRAs are provided with vulnerable scores at the 2, 4 and 6 level. (Areas with a score of 2 are least vulnerable to contamination and areas with a score of 6 are most vulnerable). This file was updated in 2018 and was approved as part of CTC's first Sec34 amendment in 2019. Within the Humber River Watershed: Polygon file displaying significant groundwater recharge areas (SGRAs) across the Toronto Region Source Protection Area (TRSPA) in the CTC Region. The SGRA layer was developed to satisfy requirements of the Source Protection Plan for the Credit Valley, Toronto and Region and Central Lake Ontario region (CTC-SPC 2015) under the Clean Water Act (2006). Groundwater recharge occurs when rain/snow seeps down into an aquifer and generally this is associated with particular soil types (e.g., loose sand/gravel). SGRAs are delineated using a water budget modelling process, where the high potential recharge areas are delineated by the method outlined in full in CTC-SPC (2015). Details of the methodology used to develop this layer can be found in CTC-SPC (2015). SGRAs have permeable soils such as sand or gravel that allow the water to soak easily into the ground. Under the Clean Water Act, 2006, a recharge area is considered significant when it helps maintain the water level in an aquifer that supplies drinking water (including private wells), and has higher than average recharge across the Source Protection Area. SGRA are provided with vulnerable scores at the 2, 4 and 6 level. (Areas with a score of 2 are least vulnerable to contamination and areas with a score of 6 are most vulnerable). This file was updated in 2018 and was approved as part of CTC's first Sec34 amendment in 2019. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
2296.0 |
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2023-10-16 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
public |
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Open Data Licence v1.0 - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://trca-camaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/camaps::hrwp-significant-groundwater-recharge-areas |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
jason.tam |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Conservation Ontario |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
[email protected] |
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
Conservation Ontario |
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
|
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
jason.tam |
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
2025-03-21 |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
4d5d3dfc84e34fcea67d7217cddecacd |
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
English |
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
https://trca-camaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/camaps::hrwp-significant-groundwater-recharge-areas |
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
Conservation Ontario |
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
2065 |
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
9 |
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
18585 |
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments