Volcanogenic massive sulphide targeting in the Noranda Camp: Using a 3D implicit modelling platform for deeper exploration through the integration of structural and geochemical vectors.
This research focuses on the potential for new deeper discoveries of VMS mineralization along known synvolcanic structures to help guide camp-scale exploration.
Abstract
The Noranda camp is a world-class region for volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits hosted in the 2704-2695 Ma volcanic Blake River assemblage, Abitibi greenstone belt. Of the ~20 VMS deposits (past production ~225 Mt ore) in the Noranda camp, the most recent discovery of the West Ansil deposit in 2005 was attributed to the integration of multidisciplinary data (geological mapping, drilling data, geochemical data and geophysical surveys), in a 3D modelling platform (GoCAD). Although there has been limited success since the discovery of West Ansil (depth from the surface: 270 m), continued exploration has shown some potential at greater depth, such as the showing at 1300 m depth in the Ribago area evident by drill logs and core samples. VMS deposits in the study area occur less than 750 m below the surface, with the exception of Ansil, which occurs at a depth of 1260 m below the surface.
This research focuses on the potential for new deeper discoveries of VMS mineralization along known synvolcanic structures to help guide camp-scale exploration. A new implicit (interpolant-based) 3D geological model was built from an updated 2017 drill hole database combined with primary lithological interpretation from the 2005 3D GoCAD geological model in Seequent’s Leapfrog® Geo®. The 3D geological model is coupled with a 3D representation of geochemical alteration signatures, mass-balance calculations, and normative minerals. Compared to existing models, the new model has a depth of 2.5 km compared to the previous 1.5 km and provides geochemical vectors that consider structural trends resulting from synvolcanic faults, which are the inferred pathways for hydrothermal fluids. Structural trends guide the 3D interpolation of alteration models and extend to greater depths, highlighting metal-bearing hydrothermal fluid pathways.
The proposed VMS targets were developed using 3D block model integration of the 3D geological model and all the developed 3D numeric models of alteration. Using queries, the block model highlights the proximal alteration zones associated with VMS deposits at the intersection of known synvolcanic faults and exhalite horizons in the area. In addition, the targets were developed considering the possibility of multiple stacked sulphide lenses deeper in the stratigraphy and the effect of zone refining was evaluated.
The developed queries yielded two potential targets in the Noranda South camp and seven potential targets in the Noranda Main camp. The Main camp targets are associated with the Beecham, Lewis, and Corbet exhalite along synvolcanic faults associated with high values of alteration and the gains/losses of major elements. Despite the sparse structural data, alterationmodelling results of the South camp targets show VMS-style alteration extending southwest of the Beauchastel fault, with high values of normative alteration index and gains in Fe and Mg concentrated in the Powell andesite of the Powell block. Most of the potential targets occur at a depth range between 400-800 m, with the exception of three targets (MCT-3, MCT5, and MCT7) that occur below 1,000 m depth. In addition, most of the drilling in the area did not extend iv deeper than the developed targets, as in the case of one potential target associated with Beecham exhalite. The target shows substantial alteration near the Beecham breccia horizon, but none of the drill holes in the area intersects the horizon.
The new 3D model and exploration targets presented here highlight the potential for VMS
discoveries at greater depth if specific key structural trends are integrated with 3D alteration
models. The potential targets are deeper than existing drill holes in the area (historical and new).
The new 3D implicit geological model has improved on Noranda's previous 3D explicit geological
model, mainly as the exhalite horizons have been updated using new contact points derived from
recent and historical drill holes. The new 3D model can be dynamically updated as exploration
progresses and new data becomes available. In addition, structural trends control the flow of rising
hydrothermal fluids and are a key input to highlight deeper prospects.
Datasets available for download
This dataset has no data
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | March 25, 2026, 02:06 (UTC) |
| Created | March 25, 2026, 02:06 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
Volcanogenic massive sulphide targeting in the Noranda Camp: Using a 3D implicit modelling platform for deeper exploration through the integration of structural and geochemical vectors. |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
This research focuses on the potential for new deeper discoveries of VMS mineralization along known synvolcanic structures to help guide camp-scale exploration. Abstract The Noranda camp is a world-class region for volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits hosted in the 2704-2695 Ma volcanic Blake River assemblage, Abitibi greenstone belt. Of the ~20 VMS deposits (past production ~225 Mt ore) in the Noranda camp, the most recent discovery of the West Ansil deposit in 2005 was attributed to the integration of multidisciplinary data (geological mapping, drilling data, geochemical data and geophysical surveys), in a 3D modelling platform (GoCAD). Although there has been limited success since the discovery of West Ansil (depth from the surface: 270 m), continued exploration has shown some potential at greater depth, such as the showing at 1300 m depth in the Ribago area evident by drill logs and core samples. VMS deposits in the study area occur less than 750 m below the surface, with the exception of Ansil, which occurs at a depth of 1260 m below the surface. This research focuses on the potential for new deeper discoveries of VMS mineralization along known synvolcanic structures to help guide camp-scale exploration. A new implicit (interpolant-based) 3D geological model was built from an updated 2017 drill hole database combined with primary lithological interpretation from the 2005 3D GoCAD geological model in Seequent’s Leapfrog® Geo®. The 3D geological model is coupled with a 3D representation of geochemical alteration signatures, mass-balance calculations, and normative minerals. Compared to existing models, the new model has a depth of 2.5 km compared to the previous 1.5 km and provides geochemical vectors that consider structural trends resulting from synvolcanic faults, which are the inferred pathways for hydrothermal fluids. Structural trends guide the 3D interpolation of alteration models and extend to greater depths, highlighting metal-bearing hydrothermal fluid pathways. The proposed VMS targets were developed using 3D block model integration of the 3D geological model and all the developed 3D numeric models of alteration. Using queries, the block model highlights the proximal alteration zones associated with VMS deposits at the intersection of known synvolcanic faults and exhalite horizons in the area. In addition, the targets were developed considering the possibility of multiple stacked sulphide lenses deeper in the stratigraphy and the effect of zone refining was evaluated. The developed queries yielded two potential targets in the Noranda South camp and seven potential targets in the Noranda Main camp. The Main camp targets are associated with the Beecham, Lewis, and Corbet exhalite along synvolcanic faults associated with high values of alteration and the gains/losses of major elements. Despite the sparse structural data, alterationmodelling results of the South camp targets show VMS-style alteration extending southwest of the Beauchastel fault, with high values of normative alteration index and gains in Fe and Mg concentrated in the Powell andesite of the Powell block. Most of the potential targets occur at a depth range between 400-800 m, with the exception of three targets (MCT-3, MCT5, and MCT7) that occur below 1,000 m depth. In addition, most of the drilling in the area did not extend iv deeper than the developed targets, as in the case of one potential target associated with Beecham exhalite. The target shows substantial alteration near the Beecham breccia horizon, but none of the drill holes in the area intersects the horizon. The new 3D model and exploration targets presented here highlight the potential for VMS
discoveries at greater depth if specific key structural trends are integrated with 3D alteration
models. The potential targets are deeper than existing drill holes in the area (historical and new).
The new 3D implicit geological model has improved on Noranda's previous 3D explicit geological
model, mainly as the exhalite horizons have been updated using new contact points derived from
recent and historical drill holes. The new 3D model can be dynamically updated as exploration
progresses and new data becomes available. In addition, structural trends control the flow of rising
hydrothermal fluids and are a key input to highlight deeper prospects. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
7291.03 |
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2022-02-15 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
public |
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
License not specified |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://metalearth.geohub.laurentian.ca/datasets/7524f30d08344a408f496d6fea4a106c |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
MetalEarth |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
|
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
MetalEarth |
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
2022-02-15 |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
7524f30d08344a408f496d6fea4a106c |
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
English |
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
https://metalearth.geohub.laurentian.ca/datasets/7524f30d08344a408f496d6fea4a106c |
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments