Mine Sludge Stability - Densification in Cold Climates
In 2001, a project was initiated to stduy the behavior of treatment sludges in northern climatic conditions. For this study, leach columns were commissioned in the laboratory to evaluate metal mobility from treatment sludges. In addition, sludge densification by the freeze-thaw mechanism was studied. Sludge samples from effluent treatment operations at United Keno Hill (UKH) and Faro mine sites were used in this study. This project has been divided into two main tasks; a leaching study and a freeze-thaw study, but conducted in the laboratory and in the field. This final report presents the results of the sludge characterization, the freeze-thaw study and the leaching study. The composition of the acid mine drainage sludge produced at Faro and UKH mine sites were different as compared to typical lime treatment sludge. The metal composition of the mine water was very low, in particular for iron. While the pH of the wastewater was near neutral, the addition of lime was required mainly to precipitate zinc. The metal content of the sludge was low and the neutralization potential was very high which was in accordance with the high carbonate content measured in the sludge. The United Keno Hill sludge was mainly composed of calcite. Instead of calcite, the Faro sludge had as a major consituent aragonite, a pseudomorph of calcite crystals. The sludge characterization revealed that the lime treatment process at both sites could be optimized. The origin of the high carbonate content of the sludge was probably from the lime quality used and from a high carbonate concentration in the mine water. Mineralogical results revealed evidence that minor amounts of calcium carbonate is from primary precipitation during the lime addition. Also, larger particles of calcium carbonate were also identified in both sludges which are thought to be from the lime used to precipitate metals. The lime treatment process could probably be improved by optimizing the slaking temperature, agitation time rate and using the proper chemical reagents to precipitate metals. The freeze-thaw mechanism evaluated in the field increased the percent solids of the sludge fromm 23% to 60% for the UKH and from 28% to 58% for the Faro sludge. The freeze-thaw study conducted in the laboratory showed final percent solids values in the same order. The capability of the sludge to dewater so easily is explained by the low amount of iron hydroxide in the sludge. Because no particle repulsion force or bond water are associated to the iron hydroxide phase. The high solids content reached in this study was mainly due to natural dewatering rather than the freeze-thaw mechanism. In terms of chemical stability, the column and the SPLP studies revealed that the metal release in minimal because of the high neutralization of both sludges. The variation of the temperature did not have any significant impact on metal mobility. Nickel and zinc were released to significant levels for both sludges when the sludges were subjected to the TCLP.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:19 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:19 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
Mine Sludge Stability - Densification in Cold Climates |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
In 2001, a project was initiated to stduy the behavior of treatment sludges in northern climatic conditions. For this study, leach columns were commissioned in the laboratory to evaluate metal mobility from treatment sludges. In addition, sludge densification by the freeze-thaw mechanism was studied. Sludge samples from effluent treatment operations at United Keno Hill (UKH) and Faro mine sites were used in this study. This project has been divided into two main tasks; a leaching study and a freeze-thaw study, but conducted in the laboratory and in the field. This final report presents the results of the sludge characterization, the freeze-thaw study and the leaching study. The composition of the acid mine drainage sludge produced at Faro and UKH mine sites were different as compared to typical lime treatment sludge. The metal composition of the mine water was very low, in particular for iron. While the pH of the wastewater was near neutral, the addition of lime was required mainly to precipitate zinc. The metal content of the sludge was low and the neutralization potential was very high which was in accordance with the high carbonate content measured in the sludge. The United Keno Hill sludge was mainly composed of calcite. Instead of calcite, the Faro sludge had as a major consituent aragonite, a pseudomorph of calcite crystals. The sludge characterization revealed that the lime treatment process at both sites could be optimized. The origin of the high carbonate content of the sludge was probably from the lime quality used and from a high carbonate concentration in the mine water. Mineralogical results revealed evidence that minor amounts of calcium carbonate is from primary precipitation during the lime addition. Also, larger particles of calcium carbonate were also identified in both sludges which are thought to be from the lime used to precipitate metals. The lime treatment process could probably be improved by optimizing the slaking temperature, agitation time rate and using the proper chemical reagents to precipitate metals. The freeze-thaw mechanism evaluated in the field increased the percent solids of the sludge fromm 23% to 60% for the UKH and from 28% to 58% for the Faro sludge. The freeze-thaw study conducted in the laboratory showed final percent solids values in the same order. The capability of the sludge to dewater so easily is explained by the low amount of iron hydroxide in the sludge. Because no particle repulsion force or bond water are associated to the iron hydroxide phase. The high solids content reached in this study was mainly due to natural dewatering rather than the freeze-thaw mechanism. In terms of chemical stability, the column and the SPLP studies revealed that the metal release in minimal because of the high neutralization of both sludges. The variation of the temperature did not have any significant impact on metal mobility. Nickel and zinc were released to significant levels for both sludges when the sludges were subjected to the TCLP. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2011-04-04 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/f114bf5f-cf86-4ccc-90f9-239ded5b2250 |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments