An Evaluation of the Gold Recovery of Placer Drills Using Radio Tracers (Part II)
In the last five years, eroding gold prices, increasing production costs and the depletion of reserves have resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of drilling to evaluate placer deposits. Accurate sampling and deposit evaluation would enable planning for cost-effective mining and reclamation. However, sampling placer gravel accurately is an extremely difficult task due to the nugget effect (inclusion or loss of a single particle of gold) and any errors are compounded by the small size of the drill samples. Additional sampling errors result from contamination, splitting and fire assaying. More placer mine failures can be attributed directly to improper sampling and sample processing practices during property evaluation than to any other cause.
There is very little impartial, accurate information available to guide the selection of modern drills. Drillers and their equipment are often selected for their penetration rate or cost-per-foot rather than for sampling accuracy or gold recovery. A brief description of several types of drills including churn, auger, rotary tricone, reverse circulation, Becker hammer, down-the-hole hammer and Sonic drills is summarized in Section 6 from references.
Three solid auger drills, two types of fully cased normal circulation (N/C) drills and two types of reverse circulation (R/C) drills were evaluated under typical Yukon field conditions using radioactive placer gold as tracers (radiotracers). A frozen cylindrical core of compacted gravel containing four sizes (1.2-1.7, 0.60-0.84, 0.3-0.42 and 0.15-0.21 mm) (-10+14, -20+28, -35+48 and -65+100 mesh) of radiotracers was placed in 44 drill holes and the holes were redrilled. Hand-held scintillometres were used to track gold losses during drilling, sample recovery and sample processing. Radiotracers lost due to spillage and blow-by around the collar (top) of the hole, and those trapped in drilling equipment (carry-over) were easily located. The results of these tests are summarized Table 1.
There was no significant difference between the recovery of the four sizes of gold particles with any of the fully cased nomal circulation, reverse circulation or auger drills tested. Observations and down-hole scintillometre records indicate that the radiotracers did not follow the bit down the hole and were either carried out of the hole or forced onto to the sides of the hole at or above the depth at which the radiotracer core was positioned.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:19 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:19 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
An Evaluation of the Gold Recovery of Placer Drills Using Radio Tracers (Part II) |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
In the last five years, eroding gold prices, increasing production costs and the depletion of reserves have resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of drilling to evaluate placer deposits. Accurate sampling and deposit evaluation would enable planning for cost-effective mining and reclamation. However, sampling placer gravel accurately is an extremely difficult task due to the nugget effect (inclusion or loss of a single particle of gold) and any errors are compounded by the small size of the drill samples. Additional sampling errors result from contamination, splitting and fire assaying. More placer mine failures can be attributed directly to improper sampling and sample processing practices during property evaluation than to any other cause. There is very little impartial, accurate information available to guide the selection of modern drills. Drillers and their equipment are often selected for their penetration rate or cost-per-foot rather than for sampling accuracy or gold recovery. A brief description of several types of drills including churn, auger, rotary tricone, reverse circulation, Becker hammer, down-the-hole hammer and Sonic drills is summarized in Section 6 from references. Three solid auger drills, two types of fully cased normal circulation (N/C) drills and two types of reverse circulation (R/C) drills were evaluated under typical Yukon field conditions using radioactive placer gold as tracers (radiotracers). A frozen cylindrical core of compacted gravel containing four sizes (1.2-1.7, 0.60-0.84, 0.3-0.42 and 0.15-0.21 mm) (-10+14, -20+28, -35+48 and -65+100 mesh) of radiotracers was placed in 44 drill holes and the holes were redrilled. Hand-held scintillometres were used to track gold losses during drilling, sample recovery and sample processing. Radiotracers lost due to spillage and blow-by around the collar (top) of the hole, and those trapped in drilling equipment (carry-over) were easily located. The results of these tests are summarized Table 1. There was no significant difference between the recovery of the four sizes of gold particles with any of the fully cased nomal circulation, reverse circulation or auger drills tested. Observations and down-hole scintillometre records indicate that the radiotracers did not follow the bit down the hole and were either carried out of the hole or forced onto to the sides of the hole at or above the depth at which the radiotracer core was positioned. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2011-04-04 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/eae708d2-a700-485b-b987-20d377f7715b |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments