The mineralogy and geochemistry of polymetallic mineral deposits at the Ketza River gold mine, Pelly Mountains, central Yukon Territory
The Ketza River polymetallic mineral deposits are situated in the Pelly Mountains, Central Yukon Territory. The deposits were mined for gold from 1988 to 1990, producing 400 tomes of oxide ore per day over that period. The Ketza River deposits are hosted by lower Paleozoic sedimentary strata of the parautochthonous Cassiar Terrane. The main host to economic mineralisation is a lower Cambrian, massive, areheocyathid-bearing limestone, which outcrops over much of the Ketza River area. Four styles of mineralisation are recognised within the Ketza River deposits. Type I mineralisation occurs in the centre of the area and consists of argillite-hosted, Au- quartz-sulphide veins. Sulphide mineralogy is mainly arsenopyrite and pyrite. Type II mineralisation consists of limestone-hosted, massive sulphide mantos and chimneys. The principal sulphide mineralogy of the mantos is pyrrhotite-arsenopyrite-pyrite-chalcopyrite, with quartz and calcite gangue. Gold is present within the arsenopyrite and pyrite. Type III mineralisation consists of limestone-hosted, quartz-sulphide veins and mantos. Mineralogy is similar to the Type II mineralisation, but contains a higher proportion of gangue. Type IV mineralisation consists of Ag-Pb veins. These veins are hosted by a variety of lithologies and represent the outermost extent of Ketza River mineralisation. Sulphide mineralogy is galena-sphalerite-pyrite, with siderite, calcite and quartz gangue. Oxidation of sulphides in parts of the Ketza River area is deep and pervasive. Areas of oxidation show increased gold grade and were the focus for mining. Oxidation occurs in the heavily fractured central area of the mineralisation, and along the Peel Fault, which extends from the centre of mineralisation towards the east. Light stable isotope studies indicate that the main mineralising fluid was of meteoric origin (delta (18)Ofluid = 10 per mil, delta Dfluid = -165 per mil). This fluid had evolved in delta (18)O by interaction with Cassiar Terrane rocks before mineralisation occured. Fluid flow in the limestones was pervasive, and produced a large, approximately 75km(2), (18)O depletion halo around the deposits. The later oxidising fluid was also of meteoric origin (delta (18)Ofluid = 18 per mil) but shows no evidence of interaction with the sedimentary pile. Fluid inclusion microthermometry suggests that the temperature of formation of the deposit was around 325 degrees C, at pressures above 600 bars. The mineralising fluid contained approximately 11 mole% CO2+ or -CH4, and 5 equivalent weight% NaCI.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:04 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:04 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
The mineralogy and geochemistry of polymetallic mineral deposits at the Ketza River gold mine, Pelly Mountains, central Yukon Territory |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
The Ketza River polymetallic mineral deposits are situated in the Pelly Mountains, Central Yukon Territory. The deposits were mined for gold from 1988 to 1990, producing 400 tomes of oxide ore per day over that period. The Ketza River deposits are hosted by lower Paleozoic sedimentary strata of the parautochthonous Cassiar Terrane. The main host to economic mineralisation is a lower Cambrian, massive, areheocyathid-bearing limestone, which outcrops over much of the Ketza River area. Four styles of mineralisation are recognised within the Ketza River deposits. Type I mineralisation occurs in the centre of the area and consists of argillite-hosted, Au- quartz-sulphide veins. Sulphide mineralogy is mainly arsenopyrite and pyrite. Type II mineralisation consists of limestone-hosted, massive sulphide mantos and chimneys. The principal sulphide mineralogy of the mantos is pyrrhotite-arsenopyrite-pyrite-chalcopyrite, with quartz and calcite gangue. Gold is present within the arsenopyrite and pyrite. Type III mineralisation consists of limestone-hosted, quartz-sulphide veins and mantos. Mineralogy is similar to the Type II mineralisation, but contains a higher proportion of gangue. Type IV mineralisation consists of Ag-Pb veins. These veins are hosted by a variety of lithologies and represent the outermost extent of Ketza River mineralisation. Sulphide mineralogy is galena-sphalerite-pyrite, with siderite, calcite and quartz gangue. Oxidation of sulphides in parts of the Ketza River area is deep and pervasive. Areas of oxidation show increased gold grade and were the focus for mining. Oxidation occurs in the heavily fractured central area of the mineralisation, and along the Peel Fault, which extends from the centre of mineralisation towards the east. Light stable isotope studies indicate that the main mineralising fluid was of meteoric origin (delta (18)Ofluid = 10 per mil, delta Dfluid = -165 per mil). This fluid had evolved in delta (18)O by interaction with Cassiar Terrane rocks before mineralisation occured. Fluid flow in the limestones was pervasive, and produced a large, approximately 75km(2), (18)O depletion halo around the deposits. The later oxidising fluid was also of meteoric origin (delta (18)Ofluid = 18 per mil) but shows no evidence of interaction with the sedimentary pile. Fluid inclusion microthermometry suggests that the temperature of formation of the deposit was around 325 degrees C, at pressures above 600 bars. The mineralising fluid contained approximately 11 mole% CO2+ or -CH4, and 5 equivalent weight% NaCI. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2011-04-04 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/e2384591-0a28-4fcc-a83a-b556c694f516 |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments