Investigations into Passive Wetlands Treatment of Mine Drainage to Remove Heavy Metals at Various Sites at United Keno Hill, Central Yukon
Wetlands have been used for decades in the treatment of municipal wastewater (sewage) in many parts of the world. Since the 1980s, wetlands have been used in the treatment of acid mine drainage, usually resulting from coal mining. Recently, natural and constructed wetlands have been researched and utilized for the removal of metals from mine drainage. Most of these wetland treatment systems have been designed and used in temperate climatic areas where permafrost, extreme minimum temperatures, and limited plant productivity is not a great concern. There is interest in northern regions on the possibility of the application of wetlands as a passive treatment system for metal contaminated mine drainage.
A research program investigating this possibility was initiated in the summer of 1995 in the vicinity of the United Keno Hill Mine property in central Yukon. A pilot wetland treatment system was constructed in May 1995 near the Galkeno 900 adit to determine whether it could improve the quality of its discharge. Sedges (Carex aquatilis) were obtained from a local natural wetland unaffected by any mine drainage and planted in the plot. After the plants were allowed to establish, untreated mine drainage was introduced to the wetland. Monitoring of the wetland continued for one season. Initial results showed that treatment within the wetland reduced concentrations of zinc, cadmium, manganese and nickel. Sulphate reduction in the sediments and formation of insoluble metal sulphides appeared to be the primary process responsible for their removal.
In 1999, further investigations were completed on this pilot project and on some of the natural wetlands which receive untreated mine drainage. Due to insufficient volumes of water flowing through the examined wetlands, they could not be fully evaluated as to their performance in the treatment of waste water. However, sediment analyses showed that metals had been attenuated. The colonization of the transplanted sedges (Carex aquatilis) in the constructed wetland was evaluated. Successful growth and propagation was apparent. These local sedges appear to be a hardy species capable of withstanding transplanting, and appear to thrive with a minimum of effort.
Metal uptake in plant tissues was also examined. Low levels were documented throughout the study area with the exception of high zinc concentration in sedges that were collected from the No Cash wetland. As Carex aquatilis, the dominant sedge found in the local wetlands, is generally unpalatable to herbivores, the low and incidental levels of metals found within the tissue of the sedges, poses little environmental concern. Overall, the preliminary results indicate that there is good potential for the use of wetlands to treat metal contaminated mine drainage.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:22 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:22 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
Investigations into Passive Wetlands Treatment of Mine Drainage to Remove Heavy Metals at Various Sites at United Keno Hill, Central Yukon |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
Wetlands have been used for decades in the treatment of municipal wastewater (sewage) in many parts of the world. Since the 1980s, wetlands have been used in the treatment of acid mine drainage, usually resulting from coal mining. Recently, natural and constructed wetlands have been researched and utilized for the removal of metals from mine drainage. Most of these wetland treatment systems have been designed and used in temperate climatic areas where permafrost, extreme minimum temperatures, and limited plant productivity is not a great concern. There is interest in northern regions on the possibility of the application of wetlands as a passive treatment system for metal contaminated mine drainage. A research program investigating this possibility was initiated in the summer of 1995 in the vicinity of the United Keno Hill Mine property in central Yukon. A pilot wetland treatment system was constructed in May 1995 near the Galkeno 900 adit to determine whether it could improve the quality of its discharge. Sedges (Carex aquatilis) were obtained from a local natural wetland unaffected by any mine drainage and planted in the plot. After the plants were allowed to establish, untreated mine drainage was introduced to the wetland. Monitoring of the wetland continued for one season. Initial results showed that treatment within the wetland reduced concentrations of zinc, cadmium, manganese and nickel. Sulphate reduction in the sediments and formation of insoluble metal sulphides appeared to be the primary process responsible for their removal. In 1999, further investigations were completed on this pilot project and on some of the natural wetlands which receive untreated mine drainage. Due to insufficient volumes of water flowing through the examined wetlands, they could not be fully evaluated as to their performance in the treatment of waste water. However, sediment analyses showed that metals had been attenuated. The colonization of the transplanted sedges (Carex aquatilis) in the constructed wetland was evaluated. Successful growth and propagation was apparent. These local sedges appear to be a hardy species capable of withstanding transplanting, and appear to thrive with a minimum of effort. Metal uptake in plant tissues was also examined. Low levels were documented throughout the study area with the exception of high zinc concentration in sedges that were collected from the No Cash wetland. As Carex aquatilis, the dominant sedge found in the local wetlands, is generally unpalatable to herbivores, the low and incidental levels of metals found within the tissue of the sedges, poses little environmental concern. Overall, the preliminary results indicate that there is good potential for the use of wetlands to treat metal contaminated mine drainage. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2011-04-04 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/4b42ef8b-5ca9-40c5-8116-d6f8f3edf50b |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments