Yukon hardrock mining, development and exploration overview 2023
Despite tough market conditions, the Yukon saw another year of significant exploration results and new discoveries. At the time of writing, Yukon Geological Survey (YGS) estimated exploration expenditures in the territory to be $147M for the year, based on company press releases, SEDAR (System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval Overview) postings and conversations with industry clients. This estimate is up 18% from $124M in 2022 (Fig. 1). Development expenditures for 2023 are estimated to be $95M (Fig. 1) and mineral production is estimated to be $495M (approximately 87% attributed to gold production, 10% to silver production and 3% to copper production), down from a total of $543M in 2022; Fig. 2).1 It was a challenging year for production due to the closure of the Minto mine and the two-week closure of Victoria Gold’s Eagle Gold mine due to wildfires in the Mayo region; however, strong precious and base-metal prices throughout the year, increased production at Eagle Gold mine, and the re-opening of the Keno Hill mine suggests that 2023 production revenue will remain strong.
There were 82 active exploration projects in the territory in 2023 (Fig. 3, Appendix 1), which was similar to 2022; however, the number of active companies and individual prospectors continues to decline. The notable increase in exploration expenditures compared with 2022 can be attributed to the progression of several exploration projects into more advanced stages. In total, 31 companies spent more than $500K on exploration and development; 19 of those spent more than $1M. Additionally, several companies were able to raise extra funding mid-season, which extended their initial proposed exploration programs.
The primary commodity in terms of total exploration expenditures in the territory continues to be gold, representing 55% of spending ($80.5M), followed by zinc-lead (25%, $37.7M), silver (9%, $13.4M), copper (9%, $13.2M), tungsten (1%, $1.0M) and nickel-PGE (1%, $900K; Fig. 4). Gold exploration has dominated expenditures since the late 1980s, often representing upward of 80% of total expenditures; however, in recent years there has been a progressive shift to a more equal split between precious metal and critical mineral exploration expenditures.
As of November 1, 2023, 5119 quartz claims had been staked in 2023 (Fig. 5). Most of the new claims were in the Mayo Mining District (60%), followed by the Whitehorse (25%) and Dawson (15%) mining districts; no new claims were staked in the Watson Lake Mining District (Fig. 6). A total of 162 564 claims remain in good standing, down from 164 924 in 2022.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:23 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:23 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
Yukon hardrock mining, development and exploration overview 2023 |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
Despite tough market conditions, the Yukon saw another year of significant exploration results and new discoveries. At the time of writing, Yukon Geological Survey (YGS) estimated exploration expenditures in the territory to be $147M for the year, based on company press releases, SEDAR (System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval Overview) postings and conversations with industry clients. This estimate is up 18% from $124M in 2022 (Fig. 1). Development expenditures for 2023 are estimated to be $95M (Fig. 1) and mineral production is estimated to be $495M (approximately 87% attributed to gold production, 10% to silver production and 3% to copper production), down from a total of $543M in 2022; Fig. 2).1 It was a challenging year for production due to the closure of the Minto mine and the two-week closure of Victoria Gold’s Eagle Gold mine due to wildfires in the Mayo region; however, strong precious and base-metal prices throughout the year, increased production at Eagle Gold mine, and the re-opening of the Keno Hill mine suggests that 2023 production revenue will remain strong. There were 82 active exploration projects in the territory in 2023 (Fig. 3, Appendix 1), which was similar to 2022; however, the number of active companies and individual prospectors continues to decline. The notable increase in exploration expenditures compared with 2022 can be attributed to the progression of several exploration projects into more advanced stages. In total, 31 companies spent more than $500K on exploration and development; 19 of those spent more than $1M. Additionally, several companies were able to raise extra funding mid-season, which extended their initial proposed exploration programs. The primary commodity in terms of total exploration expenditures in the territory continues to be gold, representing 55% of spending ($80.5M), followed by zinc-lead (25%, $37.7M), silver (9%, $13.4M), copper (9%, $13.2M), tungsten (1%, $1.0M) and nickel-PGE (1%, $900K; Fig. 4). Gold exploration has dominated expenditures since the late 1980s, often representing upward of 80% of total expenditures; however, in recent years there has been a progressive shift to a more equal split between precious metal and critical mineral exploration expenditures. As of November 1, 2023, 5119 quartz claims had been staked in 2023 (Fig. 5). Most of the new claims were in the Mayo Mining District (60%), followed by the Whitehorse (25%) and Dawson (15%) mining districts; no new claims were staked in the Watson Lake Mining District (Fig. 6). A total of 162 564 claims remain in good standing, down from 164 924 in 2022. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2024-01-11 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/2adf0f43-9a87-425a-86d0-8a7128132a0b |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments