Gold Losses at Klondike Placer Mines - Gold Recovery Project (Phase 1)
Placer mining has made significant contributions to both the history and lifestyle of the Yukon and continues to provide a stable non-governmental economic force. This year there are approximately 185 active placer mining operations with a combined reported contribution in excess of $65 million to the Yukon's small resource based economy. Placer gold recovery at many of these operations is not optimized due to a lack of access to current technology, training and testing facilities.
Current gold recovery technology is almost exclusively confined to sluice boxes. A limited number of operations additionally employ feeders and screens. Sluice boxes are very simple, reliable, inexpensive, and yield very high concentration ratios. Many factors contribute to improved recoveries with a sluice box including:
a) Controlled feed rates at less than 8 loose cubic yards/hr per foot of sluice width; b) screened pay gravels to at least 3/4 of an inch; c) adequate washing and liberation of free gold particles; d) water ratio of 17 Imperial gallons/minute per loose cubic yard of pay gravels/hr; e) use of both expanded metal and Hungarian riffles in every sluice run; f) utilization of a slick plate section before a riffle section to allow gold segregation in the slurry; g) even feeding through automation or strict manual control of loading equipment; h) sluice box gradients of between 1.5 and 2 inches/foot; and i) frequent removal of sluicebox concentrates for upgrading.
Suiceboxes can recover up to 95% of gold particles as fine as 150 mesh provided that the precious conditions are realized. Sluiceboxes may not be adequate for placer deposits containing very fine pay gravel with abundant clay and fine silt, a high proportion of high density minerals, or extrememly fine (-150 mesh) or flattened gold particles. For a White Channel deposit, an oscillating sluicebox kept riffles from packing and provided reasonable gold recovery.
Sampling design is critical for placer gold testwork because test results can be distorted by the "nugget" effect. The uneven distribution of gold particles in a placer deposit often produces large random sampling errors. A sluice tailings stream represents one of the easiest sampling locations, provided the samples are caught in the air.
Sluice tailings samples were collected from six operating Yukon mines at regular intervals with hand held buckets, sample cutters, or a large steel box depending on the coarseness of the discharge. The samples which represented between 1.5 and 7 loose cubic yards, were screened at 16 mesh and shipped to a tabling facility.
At each site, a large number of sample increments were alternately stored in two containers as interpenetrating samples over a period of 2 to 4 days. Comparison of these two samples indicated relative standard deviations (coefficient of variation) as low as 8%.These errors soared 56% (nugget effect) for two sites with high losses, when a limited number of gold particles as coarse as 14 mesh were found in their tailings.
To evaluate gold recovery efficiency, the collection of head samples is an impratical task as well as being of dubious value. At each operation, the sluice boxes were cleaned directly before and after the sampling period. A calculated head grade was determined by adding the gold recovered in the sluicebox and the gold lost to the tailings. The placer gold data recorded over the 2 to 4 day sampling periods represent only a snapshot of a total deposit's characteristics.
Datasets available for download
Additional Info
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Last Updated | October 20, 2025, 02:23 (UTC) |
| Created | October 20, 2025, 02:23 (UTC) |
|
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
|
|
|
Title
Title for the Dataset.
|
Gold Losses at Klondike Placer Mines - Gold Recovery Project (Phase 1) |
|
Description
A description of the dataset.
|
Placer mining has made significant contributions to both the history and lifestyle of the Yukon and continues to provide a stable non-governmental economic force. This year there are approximately 185 active placer mining operations with a combined reported contribution in excess of $65 million to the Yukon's small resource based economy. Placer gold recovery at many of these operations is not optimized due to a lack of access to current technology, training and testing facilities. Current gold recovery technology is almost exclusively confined to sluice boxes. A limited number of operations additionally employ feeders and screens. Sluice boxes are very simple, reliable, inexpensive, and yield very high concentration ratios. Many factors contribute to improved recoveries with a sluice box including: a) Controlled feed rates at less than 8 loose cubic yards/hr per foot of sluice width; b) screened pay gravels to at least 3/4 of an inch; c) adequate washing and liberation of free gold particles; d) water ratio of 17 Imperial gallons/minute per loose cubic yard of pay gravels/hr; e) use of both expanded metal and Hungarian riffles in every sluice run; f) utilization of a slick plate section before a riffle section to allow gold segregation in the slurry; g) even feeding through automation or strict manual control of loading equipment; h) sluice box gradients of between 1.5 and 2 inches/foot; and i) frequent removal of sluicebox concentrates for upgrading. Suiceboxes can recover up to 95% of gold particles as fine as 150 mesh provided that the precious conditions are realized. Sluiceboxes may not be adequate for placer deposits containing very fine pay gravel with abundant clay and fine silt, a high proportion of high density minerals, or extrememly fine (-150 mesh) or flattened gold particles. For a White Channel deposit, an oscillating sluicebox kept riffles from packing and provided reasonable gold recovery. Sampling design is critical for placer gold testwork because test results can be distorted by the "nugget" effect. The uneven distribution of gold particles in a placer deposit often produces large random sampling errors. A sluice tailings stream represents one of the easiest sampling locations, provided the samples are caught in the air. Sluice tailings samples were collected from six operating Yukon mines at regular intervals with hand held buckets, sample cutters, or a large steel box depending on the coarseness of the discharge. The samples which represented between 1.5 and 7 loose cubic yards, were screened at 16 mesh and shipped to a tabling facility. At each site, a large number of sample increments were alternately stored in two containers as interpenetrating samples over a period of 2 to 4 days. Comparison of these two samples indicated relative standard deviations (coefficient of variation) as low as 8%.These errors soared 56% (nugget effect) for two sites with high losses, when a limited number of gold particles as coarse as 14 mesh were found in their tailings. To evaluate gold recovery efficiency, the collection of head samples is an impratical task as well as being of dubious value. At each operation, the sluice boxes were cleaned directly before and after the sampling period. A calculated head grade was determined by adding the gold recovered in the sluicebox and the gold lost to the tailings. The placer gold data recorded over the 2 to 4 day sampling periods represent only a snapshot of a total deposit's characteristics. |
|
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
|
|
|
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
|
|
|
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
|
|
|
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
|
|
|
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
|
2011-04-04 |
|
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
|
|
|
License
License used to access the dataset.
|
Open Government Licence - Yukon |
|
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
|
|
|
Location
Location of the dataset.
|
https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/28e210e0-c073-46db-adba-dae215b01849 |
|
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
|
|
|
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
|
Government of Yukon | Gouvernement du Yukon |
|
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
|
Yukon Geological Survey |
|
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
|
|
|
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
|
|
|
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
|
[email protected] |
|
Author
Author of the dataset.
|
|
|
Author Email
Email of the author.
|
|
|
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
|
|
|
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
|
|
|
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
|
|
|
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
|
|
|
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
|
|
|
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
|
|
|
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
|
|
|
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
|
|
|
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Version
Version of the datatset
|
None |
|
Source
Source of the dataset.
|
None |
|
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
|
|
|
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
|
|
|
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
|
|
|
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
|
|
|
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
|
|
|
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
|
|
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
|
|
|
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
|
|
|
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
|
|
|
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
|
|
|
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
|
|
|
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
|
|
|
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
|
|
|
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
|
|
|
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
|
|
|
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.
|
0 Comments