RSEA Moose Core Effective Suitable Habitat

The Regional Strategic Environmental Assessment (RSEA) Moose Core Effective Suitable Habitat (RSEA_MOOSE_EFFECTIVE_SUI_HABITAT_PY) represents the core effective winter forage and shelter habitat for moose in Northeast British Columbia.

Moose populations are affected by the condition of the land and the capacity of moose habitat to provide adequate food and shelter. For the purposes of RSEA moose assessment, it was assumed that better habitats are better for moose populations. The main factors believed to influence habitat effectiveness are the amount of mature and old forests for winter shelter, having adequate forage near winter shelter and security cover, and distance from human disturbances such as roads.

RSEA developed a moose risk rating that combines population trends with information on land-based disturbance. This risk rating, therefore, captures a broader view of the condition of moose and their habitats for the northeast (NE) than just looking at habitat alone. The rating assigns several flags to each Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) depending on the population trend (decreasing, stable, increasing) and the condition of key habitat indicators such as road density, area of effective seasonal shelter and forage habitat. The more moose population flags, the higher the overall risk rating (Low, Moderate or High Risk).

A habitat effectiveness assessment, focused on four factors (outlined below), informed the overall moose risk rating results.


Winter Shelter

Winter shelter habitat suitability is estimated from Biogeoclimatic Zone (BEC) unit, leading tree species, structure (age), and stand composition (i.e., coniferous was rated higher than mixed stands which was rated higher than broadleaf leading stands).

To receive the highest rating, stands need to be mature or old forests with mixed to coniferous crown cover.


Winter Forage

Winter forage habitat suitability for moose is based on BEC unit, ecosystem type (e.g., wetland, forest, riparian, meadow, cultivated fields, etc.), structural stage (e.g., shrub vs. dense young forest), and stand composition (i.e., deciduous is rated highest). Winter forage habitat is further stratified into: (a) static habitat that does not progress through significant seral succession and includes wetlands, riparian areas, self-sustaining deciduous forests and floodplains; and (b) dynamic habitat that is created by disturbances such as fire or forest harvesting which put forested sites back to an earlier, shrubby successional stage that lasts for a relatively short period of time at a specific location.

To be considered effective, winter forage habitat must be located outside disturbance buffers and close to suitable winter shelter.


Core Effective Areas for Winter Shelter and Forage

Areas where winter shelter and forage are in proximity to each other are considered of higher value to moose compared to large areas of just shelter or just food. This indicator measures moose winter range potential containing effective shelter AND static and dynamic forage within a 10km2 search area.


Data Contact Information:

Angela White, Section Head, Resource Stewardship Operations, Northeast Region. 

Email: [email protected] 

or 

Jennifer Brooks, NE Geospatial Services Team Lead. 

Email: [email protected]

Datasets available for download

Additional Info

Field Value
Last Updated March 24, 2026, 21:09 (UTC)
Created March 24, 2026, 21:09 (UTC)
Domain / Topic
Domain or topic of the dataset being cataloged.
Title
Title for the Dataset.
RSEA Moose Core Effective Suitable Habitat
Description
A description of the dataset.

The Regional Strategic Environmental Assessment (RSEA) Moose Core Effective Suitable Habitat (RSEA_MOOSE_EFFECTIVE_SUI_HABITAT_PY) represents the core effective winter forage and shelter habitat for moose in Northeast British Columbia.

Moose populations are affected by the condition of the land and the capacity of moose habitat to provide adequate food and shelter. For the purposes of RSEA moose assessment, it was assumed that better habitats are better for moose populations. The main factors believed to influence habitat effectiveness are the amount of mature and old forests for winter shelter, having adequate forage near winter shelter and security cover, and distance from human disturbances such as roads.

RSEA developed a moose risk rating that combines population trends with information on land-based disturbance. This risk rating, therefore, captures a broader view of the condition of moose and their habitats for the northeast (NE) than just looking at habitat alone. The rating assigns several flags to each Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) depending on the population trend (decreasing, stable, increasing) and the condition of key habitat indicators such as road density, area of effective seasonal shelter and forage habitat. The more moose population flags, the higher the overall risk rating (Low, Moderate or High Risk).

A habitat effectiveness assessment, focused on four factors (outlined below), informed the overall moose risk rating results.


Winter Shelter

Winter shelter habitat suitability is estimated from Biogeoclimatic Zone (BEC) unit, leading tree species, structure (age), and stand composition (i.e., coniferous was rated higher than mixed stands which was rated higher than broadleaf leading stands).

To receive the highest rating, stands need to be mature or old forests with mixed to coniferous crown cover.


Winter Forage

Winter forage habitat suitability for moose is based on BEC unit, ecosystem type (e.g., wetland, forest, riparian, meadow, cultivated fields, etc.), structural stage (e.g., shrub vs. dense young forest), and stand composition (i.e., deciduous is rated highest). Winter forage habitat is further stratified into: (a) static habitat that does not progress through significant seral succession and includes wetlands, riparian areas, self-sustaining deciduous forests and floodplains; and (b) dynamic habitat that is created by disturbances such as fire or forest harvesting which put forested sites back to an earlier, shrubby successional stage that lasts for a relatively short period of time at a specific location.

To be considered effective, winter forage habitat must be located outside disturbance buffers and close to suitable winter shelter.


Core Effective Areas for Winter Shelter and Forage

Areas where winter shelter and forage are in proximity to each other are considered of higher value to moose compared to large areas of just shelter or just food. This indicator measures moose winter range potential containing effective shelter AND static and dynamic forage within a 10km2 search area.


Data Contact Information:

Angela White, Section Head, Resource Stewardship Operations, Northeast Region. 

Email: [email protected] 

or 

Jennifer Brooks, NE Geospatial Services Team Lead. 

Email: [email protected]
Tags / Keywords
Keywords/tags categorizing the dataset.
Format (CSV, XLS, TXT, PDF, etc)
File format of the dataset.
Dataset Size
Dataset size in megabytes.
0.1
Metadata Identifier
Metadata identifier – can be used as the unique identifier for catalogue entry
08c6987c87304c34be12cd3f33bf8bb3
Published Date
Published date of the dataset.
2023-06-23
Time Period Data Span (start date)
Start date of the data in the dataset.
Time Period Data Span (end date)
End date of time data in the dataset.
GeoSpatial Area Data Span
A spatial region or named place the dataset covers.
Field Value
Access category
Type of access granted for the dataset (open, closed, service, etc).
public
License
License used to access the dataset.
This data is for representation purposes only. The BC Energy Regulator provides this data "as is" with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be accurate, correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the responsibility of the user. It carries no guarantee of any kind, express or implied.Please review the BCER Open Data License for complete details.
Limits on use
Limits on use of data.
Location
Location of the dataset.
https://data-bc-er.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/08c6987c87304c34be12cd3f33bf8bb3
Data Service
Data service for accessing a dataset.
Owner
Owner of the dataset.
BC_Energy_Regulator
Contact Point
Who to contact regarding access?
Contact Point Email
The email to contact regarding access?
Publisher
Publisher of the dataset.
Publisher Email
Email of the publisher.
Author
Author of the dataset.
BC_Energy_Regulator
Author Email
Email of the author.
Accessed At
Date the data and metadata was accessed.
2023-08-10
Field Value
Identifier
Unique identifier for the dataset.
08c6987c87304c34be12cd3f33bf8bb3
Language
Language(s) of the dataset
English
Link to dataset description
A URL to an external document describing the dataset.
https://data-bc-er.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/08c6987c87304c34be12cd3f33bf8bb3
Persistent Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent identifier.
Globally Unique Identifier
Data is identified by a persistent and globally unique identifier.
Contains data about individuals
Does the data hold data about individuals?
Contains data about identifiable individuals
Does the data hold identifiable data about individual?
Contains Indigenous Data
Does the data hold data about Indigenous communities?
Portal Type
Platform type of the source portal.
Field Value
Version
Version of the datatset
None
Source
Source of the dataset.
None
Version notes
Version notes about the dataset.
Is version of another dataset
Link to dataset that it is a version of.
Other versions
Link to datasets that are versions of it.
Provenance Text
Provenance Text of the data.
Provenance URL
Provenance URL of the data.
Temporal resolution
Describes how granular the date/time data in the dataset is.
GeoSpatial resolution in meters
Describes how granular (in meters) geospatial data is in the dataset.
GeoSpatial resolution (in regions)
Describes how granular (in regions) geospatial data is in the dataset.
Field Value
Indigenous Community Permission
Who holds the Indigenous Community Permission. Who to contact regarding access to a dataset that has data about Indigenous communities.
Community Permission
Community permission (who gave permission).
The Indigenous communities the dataset is about
Indigenous communities from which data is derived.
Field Value
Number of data rows
If tabular dataset, total number of rows.
1298
Number of data columns
If tabular dataset, total number of unique columns.
6
Number of data cells
If tabular dataset, total number of cells with data.
7788
Number of data relations
If RDF dataset, total number of triples.
Number of entities
If RDF dataset, total number of entities.
Number of data properties
If RDF dataset, total number of unique properties used by the triples.
Data quality
Describes the quality of the data in the dataset.
Metric for data quality
A metric used to measure the quality of the data, such as missing values or invalid formats.

0 Comments

Please login or register to comment.